Lock your doors!
My office discovered an alternate link to the state sex offenders database. Whereas you had to have the name and social security number before, this one lets you search by street name. Boy, does that give you better results! We found 2 registered child molesters living in my apartment complex, which is also one of our clients. So, we looked up their account to see if they ran criminal reports on these two dirtbags. One they had, but at that time, he hadn't registered yet (I think they have 30 days to do so). Crafty timing on his part?
The other offender is an unauthorized occupant (someone who is not on the elase and not supposed to be living there). Doh! We were pretty troubled by that, so we called up the leasing office to let them know what we'd found. They were shocked and thanked us profusely. (That is especially amusing to me, considering how they have dealt with safety concerns in the past- by pooh-poohing them and blowing you off.) I wondered what, if any, action they would take. By law, they could call the cops to remove him AND file for eviction on the current leaseholder for violating their lease.
On my way home, I saw two unmarked police cars. I slowed my pace to watch two plain clothes detectives walking up to the building of that illegal resident child molester! Of course, I can't be 100% certain that is exactly where they were headed and precisely why, but it definitely raised my eyebrows! (Or, um, where my eyebrows would be, if I had any… ha!)
I've known for a long time that there's a serious problem with criminal reporting in Indiana. The media recently exposed that there are backlogs of data entry- as much as 3 years in some areas! Landlords, employers etc etc will find no record on applicants who have been arrested and/or convicted in the past 3 years! Think of all the dirtbags that could have slipped through the cracks and now be working in instituitions like schools or living right next door to me! Pretty frightening! Oh, but it goes even deeper than that… there are 3 types of crimnal reports available: Instant “Statewide,” Sheriff Dept Records, Department Of Corrections (DOC), and County searches. There are screening companies that a) don't know the difference between them, B) don't bother to inform their clients about exactly what they are getting and the [in]accuracy of the data.
The Instant “Statewide”s are not really statewide at all! We have 92 counties and not all of them report criminal data! They are not required to do so, so many just don't! By ordering that type, if a person has committed an offense in one of those counties, you won't know about it- you're SOL.
The sheriff's department records have a similar issue… not all sheriff's departments report- they aren't required to, and also if a person was arrested by any bureau other than the sheriff, there again will be no record of it.
Now, the Department Of Correction records only show those who were convicted and served time in a state facility. Say an applicant gets trashed every weekend and beats the living shit out of people (girlfriend? wife? kids?) on a regular basis, but they've never been in a state pen for it – you won't see anything about it.
We encourage our customers to order County searches, because they involve an actual real live person sifting through arrest and conviction information and writing dow nanything they find. Unfortunately, because these are not a quick scan of a computer database, they can take anywhere from 24 hours (for the capital city) or 3 to 5 working days (for any other jurisdiction). Some operations are only concerned about how quickly they can get back an answer, and no so much how thorough that result may or may not be. (This is especially true in real estate- they worry that if it takes to long, they'll lose the sale.)
I have a sneaking suspicion that Indiana isn't the only state with these problems. I know for a fact that there are others that have that same issue with not all their counties supplying criminal information to so-called “statewide” databases.
You would think that after 9/11, there would be a big hullabaloo about this sort of thing. My employer has spent years lobbying for some legislation to establish a standard for these reports. We've involed other landlords and housing organizations, we've gone to lawmakers, we've gone to the media- all to no avail. Even though, by and large, I am not willing to trade personal freedoms for security, year after year, I feel progressively less safe. I will acknowledge that. And, I must admit, This is one of the very few areas in which I would prefer some govermental mandating.
Edited: April 29th, 2005

































